Scandal Surrounds Steampunk Iron Man Costume

by Sean Fallon on October 15, 2010

in Cosplay,Movies,News


Remember that awesome steampunk Iron Man suit that won the costume contest at Comic Con recently? Well, as it turns out, the idea may not be all that original.

In fact, it appears that the costume is nothing more than a repainted and slightly tweaked version of a Tin Man suit made for an indie movie. And, Bill Johnson, the designer of said Tin Man suit is understandably pissed off.

Just found out that the Tin Man suit was taken and modified into an “Iron Man” suit that won the costume contest at the NY Comic Con by my ex assistant. The suit was changed without my knowledge or permission and I’m royally angered by this action. It’s also sad to see that the only screen used version of the suit that exists, is now a cheapened knock off of a popular character. I don’t get people anymore and it makes me want even more to become more reclusive.

Interestingly, Dustin Fletcher, one of the men behind the development of the suit left a comment in the original Fashionably Geek article about the Iron Man modification, but the tone was positive—even complimentary towards Sliva’s modifications. It’s only now, through comments left in TheEffectsLab forum, that we learned the full story behind the costume.

The good news is that the two men have apparently ironed things out:

I had a long talk with him and we ironed things out. It was all part of a huge lapse in good judgment that blew up. I hate to see a piece of history, such as this piece, fade away like that. I guess that I am getting old and sentimental.

He was acting as the person who was holding on to the suit for promotional events for the film. He did help build it and said that it was constantly needing repair (which I do believe). He’s not very old and just showed a serious lapse of good judgment. As for the suit’s ownership, that is a grey area. The company that made the film paid for the materials and did give me a very small amount of money for all the work that I did (Production design, make up effects, etc) just to help with my bills while I took time off to do the project. I have most of the items created or bought for the film, but agreed to let them hold on to the suit for display in their office or promotion for the film. I would not say that it was stolen, but was not used in the manner of our agreement. He truly feels horrible for doing such an idiotic thing and I know that he is really a good kid at heart. Ultimately, what’s done is done and I’m sure he won’t do such a stupid thing again in the future.

I don’t know that I would call the move idiotic just yet. It never fails that people in these types of situations fail to see how the press coverage benefits them. After all, who the hell would have even heard of this movie, or the men behind the suit design had it not been for the Iron Man costume?

(via Bleeding Cool)

  • Rayna

    I have to speak up to say that I had heard of the film, long before this issue came up. It’s really well done and worth watching. Geeks are Sexy, Tor, Escapist Magazine and Dragon*Con featured it, as did most steampunk sites. So a lot of geeks have heard about the film. And it was even featured on USA Today’s PopCandy.

    http://vimeo.com/11431902

    So I’d have to vote that the guy was an idiot.

    • Sean Fallon

      I’ll bet most people have never heard of it – certainly not as many as are aware of it now. Either way, this is going to end up being good press for both the film and the talent of the designers.

  • MechaPumpkin

    I just want to address one statement made by the original creator of the Tin Man suit . . .

    “It’s also sad to see that the only screen used version of the suit that exists, is now a cheapened knock off of a popular character.”

    Okay, what does he mean by this? The new Iron Man version is a cheapened version of Iron Man, or his Tin Man? Can he say that his Tin Man is not a cheapened knock off of the original Tin Man? (Which I would disagree with, I think it’s great work).

    Either way, I don’t see anything cheapened or weak about either version of their costume. I also don’t see Iron Man as some Johnny-come-lately character, whether he’s now “popular” or not.

    I just don’t really understand what he’s trying to say here. Frankly, any way I decipher it, I still don’t agree.

    Can anyone clarify?

    • Sean Fallon

      He was saying that it is sad that the only version of the Tin Man suit he helped build has become nothing more than a derivative of Iron Man. In his view, that cheapens the suit as a whole.

      • MechaPumpkin

        Right, so knock off of Iron Man, cheap. Knock off of Tin Man, classy.

        I do now understand that he’s upset that the only screen used version of HIS costume is destroyed. That I get, and I know how that feels. But the shot at Iron Man is a little uncalled for.

        I guess the reason I had problems with his statement was grammar. He was saying two different things and it sounded like one. One point I agree with, the other I don’t.

  • http://dawnxianamoon.com Dawn

    I’d watched the film before seeing this story – it was passed around a couple of months ago by one of my friends, so I suspect it was more popular than you may have guessed. The film is well done and I highly recommend watching it. That said, the extra publicity probably doesn’t hurt either.

Previous post:

Next post: